<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>data centers on 3V.org</title>
    <link>https://3v.org/tags/data-centers/</link>
    <description>Recent content in data centers on 3V.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://3v.org/tags/data-centers/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Meta&#39;s Hyperion Data Center in Louisiana Was Negotiated With Tax Breaks and Little Public Input</title>
      <link>https://3v.org/metas-hyperion-data-center-in-louisiana-was-negotiated-with-tax-breaks-and-little-public-input/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://3v.org/metas-hyperion-data-center-in-louisiana-was-negotiated-with-tax-breaks-and-little-public-input/</guid>
      <description>Reporting on Meta&amp;rsquo;s Hyperion data center in Louisiana describes a secretive negotiation process that produced tax breaks and proceeded with limited public input. The specifics are local. The pattern is not, and it is worth separating the two, because the mechanics described in Louisiana are the standard operating procedure for large data center siting across the United States.
How the process is designed to work Large facility negotiations typically begin under a code name, with the identity of the company withheld from local officials and the public through non-disclosure agreements signed by economic development staff.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
