<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>supreme court on 3V.org</title>
    <link>https://3v.org/tags/supreme-court/</link>
    <description>Recent content in supreme court on 3V.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://3v.org/tags/supreme-court/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Shadow Docket Is Not a Conspiracy. It Is a Structural Problem.</title>
      <link>https://3v.org/the-shadow-docket-is-not-a-conspiracy.-it-is-a-structural-problem./</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://3v.org/the-shadow-docket-is-not-a-conspiracy.-it-is-a-structural-problem./</guid>
      <description>The term &amp;ldquo;shadow docket&amp;rdquo; refers to the Supreme Court&amp;rsquo;s practice of issuing significant legal rulings through emergency orders and summary dispositions — without full briefing, oral argument, or signed majority opinions. The label was coined by law professor William Baude and has since migrated from academic discourse into mainstream political conversation, where it is sometimes framed as partisan grievance rather than institutional critique.
The critique is legitimate regardless of which administration benefits from it.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
